Shakespeare Colloquium: Shakespeare's Metadrama
Professor Richard Horwich
New York University
Fall 2007
the many roles of Hal: wayward son, robber, king, true heir
special effects of Falsaff's tale
English hierarchy: Royalty (5) -> Lords/Barons (500) -> Knights/gentires (5000) -> commons
RE: Prince Charles: "what has he done? he's spent 50 years waiting for his mother to die"
time in first scene vs. time in second
JoAnne Akalaitis production at the Public- tavern done in modern dress while courtroom scenes were historically acurate, showed how the world of the court passes put the tavern world is timeless
Hotspur- Fortinbras? Rambo vengence? glory? basically fights to fight
honour hides selfishness
Hotspur/Henry/Henry, Henry/Harry/Hal
Hotspur looks down on the middle class, women
Falstaff and hotspur as comics- imitations, fat and skinny
Hotspur considers the messenger an aberration of natural man (Osrick)
any time a character imitates another character or does impressions, it's fundamentally a play within a play
2.4- three parts, all directed, all about playing
Falstaff's joint stool would have been the same as Henry's throne
Vernon's speech: reported because a) can't have a horse on-stage and b) it's clear the importance (also shows hal is being talked about) -> would have been hoisted up and lowered onto the horse in reality
chivalry- the best man really does win (lost in richard's reign)
if they don't wait, they lose (greater glory in death)
the becoming of a hero requires a new name
question of Falstaff's death can only be answered in perfromance
more a coming of age play than a history play
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment